Committee of Adjustment
Revised Agenda

Meeting #:
Date:
Time:
-
Location:
Council Chambers
7 Broadway Street West
Paris, ON

Alternative formats and communication supports are available upon request. For more information, please contact the County of Brant Accessibility and Inclusion Coordinator at 519-442-7268 or by email [email protected]


RECOMMENDATION


THAT Application for Minor Variance A18-24-LK from Jill Palmer, Owner of lands legally described as PLAN 581 LOT 49, municipally known as 112 Dundas Street West, Former Town of Paris, County of Brant, is seeking relief from Zoning By-law 61-16 to permit a maximum accessory structure height of 4.8 metres whereas 4.5 metres is permitted, and to recognize the existing street setback of 3.93 metres, whereas 4.5 metres is required, BE
APPROVED.


THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject lands;
  • The proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law 61-16;
  • The proposed variance meets the four tests of the Planning Act.

RECOMMENDATION


THAT Consent Application B26-24-LK from J.H Cohoon Engineering, Agent on behalf of Taylor Whiting and Lisa Whiting, Owners of lands legally described as Part Lot 6 Concession 1, Part 1 on 2R-4504, former Geographic Township of Oakland and municipally known as 19 King Street South, County of Brant, proposing a lot line adjustment of approximately 0.18 hectares (0.44 acres) to be added to landlocked Blocks 18 and 19, 2M-1845, known as benefiting lands BE APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions.


THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The application will provide frontage for the landlocked blocks 18 & 19 to facilitate construction of one single detached dwelling.
  • The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Planning Statement (2024).
  • The application conforms with the policies of the County of Brant Official Plan (2023) and Zoning By-Law.

RECOMMENDATION


THAT Consent Application B27-24-LK from Cohoon Engineering Ltd on behalf of Howard Hussey, Owner of lands legally known as South Dumfries Concession 2 Part Lot 11 Registered Plan 2R4549 PT Parts 2 and 4, municipally known as 290 Brant County Highway 5, proposing a lot line adjustment to sever a 352.5 square metre strip of land from of the western property line to be added to the abutting property at 292 Brant County Highway 5, BE APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions.


THAT reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The application is in conformity and consistent with the policies of Provincial Policy Statement.
  • The application is in conformity with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

RECOMMENDATION


THAT Consent Application B17-24-LK from MHBC Planning, Agent, on behalf of Ruie and William Greenwood, Owners of the lands legally described as Concession 6 Part Lot 2, in the Former Township of Burford, municipally known as 29 Sixth Concession Road, proposing to sever approximately 3.1 hectares from 29 Sixth Concession Road to the benefitting lands municipally known as 62 King Street, BE APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions.


THAT reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The consent application maintains the function of the existing residential and agricultural land uses.
  • The application is in conformity with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement;
  • The application is in conformity with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

AND


THAT Minor Variance Application A1-25-LK from MHBC Planning, Agent, on behalf of Ruie and William Greenwood, Owners of the lands legally described as Concession 6 Part Lot 2, in the Former Township of Burford, municipally known as 29 Sixth Concession Road, seeking the following:

  1. Relief under Planning Act, Section 45(1) to permit a lot area of 0.6 hectares for the proposed retained lands; and
  2. Relief under Planning Act, Section 45(2) to permit the extension of a legal nonconforming use in recognition of the existing residential land uses.

BE APPROVED.


THAT reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate function of the subject lands;
  • The proposed minor variance is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan and permits extension of the existing residential legal non-conforming condition of the site.

RECOMMENDATION


THAT Application for Consent B25-24-LG from Paulsan Construction Inc. c/o Zach Hoffner, applicant on behalf of Paulsan Construction Inc. c/o Paul McCaig, Owner or lands legally described as CONCESSION 5 PART LOT 1, in the geographic Township of Burford, municipally known as 354 Bishopsgate Road, County of Brant, proposing a lot line adjustment, having an area of approximately 0.27 hectares (0.67 acres) to be severed from 354 Bishopsgate Road and consolidated with 356 Bishopsgate Road, BE APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions.


THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The lot line adjustment is technical, minor in nature and compatible with surrounding land uses.
  • The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Planning Statement.
  • The application is in conformity/ compliance with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law. 

RECOMMENDATION


THAT Application for Consent B1-25-LG from WEBB Planning Consultants Inc. c/o James Webb, applicant on behalf of Greycan 13 Properties Inc. c/o Chris Serio, Owner or lands legally described as PLAN 2M1990 BLK 2, in the geographic Township of Brantford, County of Brant, proposing the creation of one (1) new industrial lot within the recently registered subdivision PS2-20-RC, BE APPROVED, subject to the attached conditions.


THAT the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

  • The lot creation is compatible and consistent within the context of the existing development.
  • Detailed design and technical review of the proposed Prestige Industrial parcel will be facilitated through Site Plan Control.
  • The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Planning Statement.
  • The application is in conformity/ compliance with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law.