Planning and Development Committee
Revised Agenda

b. THAT the Telecommunication Tower as proposed at 510 Brant-Waterloo Road is not in accordance with Section 4.iii – ‘Preferred Location Guidelines’ of the ‘Communication Tower and Communication Antenna Preferred Location Protocol (2020)’.

8.
Public Hearings Under the Planning Act to Receive Information from the Public

8.1
RPT-0143-23-ZBA6-23-LG 738 Mount Pleasant Road - L. Graham

1.ZBA6-23-LG - 738 Mount Pleasant Road - Information (April 2023).pdf

2.2022 11 07_Teja_738 Mt Pleasant Rd, Brant_Singles Concept Plan.pdf

3.03 Aerial Map.pdf

Recommendation

That the Zoning By-law Amendment application proposing to rezone the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Suburban Residential (SR) with site specific provision XX (SR-XX), in order to permit area of approximately 747 square metres (0.18 acres), whereas a minimum of 1,000 square metres (0.25 acres) is required; to permit a frontage of 9.19 metres (30.15 feet), whereas a minimum 20 metres (65.62 feet) is required; to permit exterior side yard setback of 5.0 metres (16.40 feet), whereas a minimum of 7.5 metres (24.61 feet) is required; and to facilitate a future residential severance, be received as information and any comments/ submissions regarding this application be referred to staff for review;

And that the Zoning By-law Amendment application proposing to rezone the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Suburban Residential (SR) with site specific provision XX (h-SR-XX), in order to rezone the future severed lands with a holding provision due to capacity restraints; to permit an area of approximately 747 square metres (0.18 acres), whereas a minimum of 1,000 square metres (0.25 acres) is required; to permit a frontage of 9.19 metres (30.15 feet), whereas a minimum 20 metres (65.62 feet) is required; to permit exterior side yard setback of 5.0 metres (16.40 feet), whereas a minimum of 7.5 metres (24.61 feet) is required; and to facilitate a future residential severance, be received as information and any comments/ submissions regarding this application be referred to staff for review.

9.
Public Hearings Under the Planning Act to Consider Staff Recommendations

9.1
RPT-0532-22-ZBA38-20-DN 6 Maple Ave North - D. Namisniak

1.ZBA38-20-DN- 6 Maple Burford- REC PPT (April 2023).pdf

2.ZBA38-20-DN-6 Maple Ave - FINAL Report (April 2023).pdf

3.ZBA38-20-DN - By-Law (April 2023).pdf

4.00_ZBA38-20-DN_ByLaw Map.pdf

5.03_ZBA38-20-DN_Aerial Map.pdf

6.6 Maple Ave_Conceptual Site Plan Render_Jan 3 2023.pdf

7.Public Comments-Info May 2022-Warren Bell_Redacted.pdf

Recommendation

That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA38-20-DN from MHBC Planning, Agent, on behalf of Grover Developments Ltd, Applicant/ Owner of lands legally described as Plan 727, Lot 98 & Lot 99, in the geographic Township of Burford, municipally known as 6 Maple Ave North, proposing to change the zoning on the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Residential Multiple Low Density (RM1) subject to a ‘Holding Provision (h-RM1)’ being applied to the entirety of the Subject Lands until such time that a desirable and appropriate level of municipal servicing is available, determined and guided by the completion of the Burford Master Servicing Class Environmental Assessment to the satisfaction of the County of Brant, be approved;

And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

The application represents desirable infill redevelopment, permitting a range of housing types within an established neighborhood, utilizing existing surrounding infrastructure and amenities.
The Holding Provision (h) will determine the timing for desirable and appropriate development of the subject lands based on planned and/or available services;
The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; and
The application is in conformity with the policies of the County of Brant Official Plan (2012) and meets the general intent of Zoning By-Law 61-16.

Recommendation

That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA4-23-DN from The Angrish Group, Agent, on behalf of Nick Vahrmeyer, Applicant/ Owner of lands legally described as Part Lot 23, East of Fairchilds Creek, Part Lot 41, River Range, East of Fairchilds Creek; Part Lot 9 South of John Street, Part Lot 9 North of Cedar Street, Plan 103, in the Geographic Township of Onondaga and municipally known as 524 Old Onondaga Road East, County of Brant, proposing the following to Zoning By-Law 61-16:

1. To allow the application of a Special Exemption to the Residential Hamlet and Villages (RH-27) zone to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.5 metres (41 feet), whereas a minimum of 30 metres (98 feet) is required;
2. To allow the application of a Special Exemption to the Agricultural (A-193) zone to recognize the remaining undersized area of the agricultural portion having an area of 5.3 hectares (13 acres); and
3. To permit an expansion of the Natural Heritage (NH) Zone to incorporate a 30 metre buffer from the identified watercourse, be approved;

And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows:

The Applicants have demonstrated the adequate access to the remaining farm parcel;
Potential nuisance issues between the farm and non-farm related uses are protected under the rules and procedures of the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board (NFPPB);
The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; and
The application is in conformity with the policies of the County of Brant Official Plan (2012) and meets the general intent of Zoning By-Law 61-16.